Grams.) The marriage off Draw MEEKS and you will Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?)

The guy ordered and you may increased right here what turned their family towards the next 22 age and on this one most of the children had been produced except the two eldest. Within the 1891 the guy sold which home and ordered section 32 for the cut off ten regarding five kilometers northeast regarding Chillicothe, which he improved and you will kept as a house-stead.

Sworn to help you and you may subscribed just before me personally, it twenty-first day’s Oct

His Religious life prolonged because använda weblänken of a period of more forty years. He kept solidly on the Ancient Baptist faith, hence became their entire consolation within his history months and by both precepts and you will example he illustrated the highest version of an American resident.

Mark MEEKS’ second relationships, to help you Sarah Ann FULLERTON COBB COHEN(?),[COMMENT] are September 21, 1858 from inside the Claiborne Parish, Louisiana. There’s nothing identified regarding a married relationship in order to an effective COHEN apart from the wedding licenses, submitted within Matrimony Publication step 1, webpage 914, ideas the wedding since the ranging from elizabeth, and Sarah generated their particular draw. The wedding is performed from the J. W. McKINZIE, J. P.

T. KERLEY

I, T. T. KERLEY, would solemnly claim which i was 21 years of age, which Skip W. C. MEEKS was 18/eight years old, and this there are no legal arguments to your Relationships. J. C. WELLS getting bound states that moms and dads of Skip W. C. MEEKS has actually considering the complete accept the marriage of its child to Mr. T.

Sarah and you can Mark stayed to the west of Haynesville into the Claiborne Parish having a while along with most likely only 1 child, Willia Celestia MEEKS, the newest spouse away from T. All the family relations facts signify Willia Celestia MEEKS KERLEY was given birth to November 30, 1865, at the Vow, Bienville Parish, Louisiana, while the grave marker implies a night out together out of delivery off 1865. I would suggest, however, your go out away from birth might have indeed been November 30, 1863 as opposed to that big date during the 1865. Of course, there’s absolutely no delivery certification. This new dying certification isn’t any let, because it implies a night out together out of birth off November 29, 1886, over 5 years following the go out away from their unique relationship. It does indicate an era at the death of 52, and because the latest demise taken place January 16, 1919, she’d was basically produced in 1866, putting some 1886 likely a great typographical mistake. In support of the many beginning big date, You will find about three arguments:

  • The new census taker-in 1870, functioning August 23, 1870, indicated that new child’s years is 9. While census takers is infamously crappy from the ages, it is very uncommon, I do believe, for that young an infant getting a delivery go out you to definitely far off. It could only be 36 months wrong to your fixed time rather than five years wrong toward 1965 date. The brand new 1880 census taker listed age since 18, once again too old to own sometimes big date and you may incorrect as in advance of their own relationship, revealed less than, when she was not but really 18.
  • Probably the most serious argument You will find ‘s the relationships license, copied verbatim for the shape ?. There’s two alter with the printed setting, the original being the requirements the lady feel at the very least you are years old without parental agree, in addition to second are your out-dated setting was published to be used into very first around three digits of your go out becoming “187”, which is entered upon tell you a date out-of October 21, 1881. Getting an excellent November 29th birthday celebration and become seventeen, the year of birth must be 1863. If the she was fifteen instead of throughout the 30 days timid of to try to get, do new clerk have approved the word of your own groom’s uncle the bride’s moms and dads accepted the wedding?